4.7 Review

Evolution of the archaeal and mammalian information processing systems: towards an archaeal model for human disease

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
卷 74, 期 2, 页码 183-212

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-016-2286-y

关键词

Mutation; Cancer; Medicine; Health; Genome; TACK; Prokaryote; Methanococcus

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB-1410102]
  2. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1410102] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current evolutionary models suggest that Eukaryotes originated from within Archaea instead of being a sister lineage. To test this model of ancient evolution, we review recent studies and compare the three major information processing subsystems of replication, transcription and translation in the Archaea and Eukaryotes. Our hypothesis is that if the Eukaryotes arose within the archaeal radiation, their information processing systems will appear to be one of kind and not wholly original. Within the Eukaryotes, the mammalian or human systems are emphasized because of their importance in understanding health. Biochemical as well as genetic studies provide strong evidence for the functional similarity of archaeal homologs to the mammalian information processing system and their dissimilarity to the bacterial systems. In many independent instances, a simple archaeal system is functionally equivalent to more elaborate eukaryotic homologs, suggesting that evolution of complexity is likely an central feature of the eukaryotic information processing system. Because fewer components are often involved, biochemical characterizations of the archaeal systems are often easier to interpret. Similarly, the archaeal cell provides a genetically and metabolically simpler background, enabling convenient studies on the complex information processing system. Therefore, Archaea could serve as a parsimonious and tractable host for studying human diseases that arise in the information processing systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据