4.5 Article

A three-stage stochastic model for emergency relief planning considering secondary disasters

期刊

ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 551-575

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2020.1740920

关键词

Emergency relief; location allocation; secondary disasters; three-stage stochastic programming; Benders decomposition

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [71571111, 71801143, 91846205]
  2. Innovation Method Fund of China [2018IM020200]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [2018JC055]
  4. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018QG001]
  5. Shandong University
  6. Young Scholars Program of Shandong University [2018WLJH02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a scenario-based model considering the correlation between primary and secondary disasters, making emergency relief operations more challenging. An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm and an approximation method using worst-case scenarios are formulated to enhance computational tractability. The computational study shows that considering secondary disasters can significantly improve demand satisfaction.
In the real world, secondary disasters occur frequently after primary disasters, and their diverse and uncertain nature along with the destruction may make the emergency relief operations more challenging. A scenario-based three-stage stochastic programming model is proposed considering the correlation between primary and secondary disasters under uncertain conditions. In order to enhance the computational tractability of the model, an accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm is formulated. In addition, to tackle large-scale cases, an approximation method employing the worst-case scenario in the third stage is established to improve the computational tractability. A computational study is performed to highlight the significance of the model and the efficiency of the proposed solution strategy. The results indicate that, by considering secondary disasters, demand satisfaction can be considerably improved compared with considering only primary disasters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据