4.7 Article

Failure behavior investigation of loess metro tunnel under local-high-pressure water environment

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104631

关键词

Metro tunnel; Loess; Model test; Numerical simulation; Failure behavior

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978066]
  2. Construction Science and Technology Project of Xi'an [SZJJ2019-23]
  3. Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges of Chang'an University [300102219117]
  4. Open Fund for Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Space Engineering [YT201905]
  5. Key RAMP
  6. D Plan of Shaanxi Province [2020SF-428]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the acceleration of urban metro construction in the Midwest of China, the metro tunnel is inevitably crossing the collapsible loess site. For the metro tunnels in loess area, if the around potential water source is induced by external disturbance, the tunnel structure which is con-structed or being built will be influenced in the affected area of loess collapsibility. In view of this, model tests were designed according to the different water source positions and tunnel lining forms to study the collapsibility of loess and the failure behavior of metro tunnel under high-pressure water environment. And fluid-solid coupling calculation was conducted under different conditions of water source pressure, water source distance and water source location. Furthermore, the results were compared and perfected by numerical analysis, and the distribu-tion law of water pressure field, displacement field and the stress field of the tunnel were in-vestigated. Based on the calculated results, the safety distance between the water source and the tunnel was extracted, and the influence degree of water gushing on the tunnel was divided, which provides the safety evaluation index for the loess tunnel in local-high-pressure water environ-ment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据