4.7 Article

Impact of urbanization on energy demand: An empirical study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111354

关键词

Urbanization; Energy demand; Spatial analysis; Heterogeneity factors; Nighttime light

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2018YFC0213600]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71903068]
  4. Research Center on Low-carbon Economy for Guangzhou Region
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M653301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides an empirical assessment of the effects of China's urbanization on its energy demand for 2003-2014 using a dataset of 108 cities located in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Both demographic urbanization (DU) and land urbanization (LU) are considered in the empirical analysis. The results show that urbanization exerts significant and positive impacts on energy demand during the study period. Our empirical suggest that one unit rises in DU and LU rises the energy demand by 48.85% (91.62%) and 65.54% (68.09%), respectively, without (with) considering control variables. The energy demand effects of urbanization still hold when considering spatial and heterogeneity factors. These results are robust to alternative measures of urbanization and empirical model specifications. Our results indicate that policymakers should improve the quality of urbanization to promote the growth of high-tech and high-quality industries, avoiding excessive energy consumption with extensive urbanization. Large cities should not be allowed to grow unchecked. More attention should be paid to promote the development of medium-sized cities and implement a balanced population distribution among different cities. The energy demand structure (industrial and residential; primary and secondary; renewable and nonrenewable) should be optimized by introducing cleaner/low-carbon technology and its transformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据