4.7 Article

Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of an air-cooled type of absorption-ejection refrigeration cycle with R290-mineral oil as the working pair

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112703

关键词

Absorption-ejection refrigeration cycle; R290-mineral oil; Conventional exergy analysis; Advanced exergy analysis; Exergy destruction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51706077]
  2. Innovation of Science and Technology Committee of Shenzhen City [JCYJ20170307155844701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An absorption-ejection refrigeration cycle used R290-mineral oil mixture is investigated depending on both conventional and advanced exergy analysis. In this cycle, an ejector and an air-cooled type absorber are utilized to improve the exergetic efficiency of the system. The effects of generator temperature, condensing temperature, evaporating temperature, absorber outlet temperature, absorber efficiency, and pressure ratio on system exergetic efficiency have been discussed and compared with a single-effect absorption cycle in this study. Furthermore, the exergy destruction of each component has been calculated and analyzed. Besides, the exergy destruction of the major components are further researched through the advanced exergy analysis. Analytical results show that the absorption-ejection refrigeration cycle has a higher exergetic efficiency and a more extensive working condition range than the single effect absorption cycle and its exergetic efficiency can reach 0.3554. It is proved the R290/mineral oil as absorption refrigeration has great research value. In addition, the vast majority of exergy destruction appears in the generator and absorber, totally above 60%. The optimization of the generator has the highest priority due to its maximum endogenous avoidable exergy destruction. The absorber is in second place and its exergy destruction can be effectively reduced by optimizing other components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据