4.7 Article

Effect of CO2 and H2O on Char Properties. Part 2: In Situ and Ex Situ Char in Oxy-Steam Combustion

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 7554-7563

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00845

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0600801, 2018YFB0605100]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M632851]
  3. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program [63]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physical and chemical properties of H2O (oxy-steam combustion) and N-2 (air combustion) are different, which has influence on the char properties in oxy-steam combustion. Measuring in situ char (without any cooling) kinetic parameters is very important, especially at oxy-steam atmosphere. Both in situ and ex situ char properties were investigated in this paper. Ex situ char was obtained at different cooling rates. Char properties were measured by X-ray diffraction, H/C ratio, Raman spectrum, and specific surface area. The effect of steam on in situ and ex situ char combustion kinetics were determined. We found that the combustion reaction rates of different chars are in order of in situ > rapid cooling (10(3)-10(4) K/s) > medium cooling (10-100 K/s) > slow cooling char (0.1 K/s). The rapid cooling char structure is disordered and has a high active surface area, which results in the high reactivity. In situ char has a shorter burn-out time, a faster combustion rate, and a higher reaction constant. For example, at 903 K, it appears the reaction rate of 0.048 s(-1) for ex situ char (Vientiane coal char) in oxy-steam atmosphere (30% O-2 + 15% H2O), while that of in situ char is 0.07 s(-1). The reactivity of in situ char is higher than that of ex situ char. The activation energy of in situ char (e.g., 20.9 kJ/mol) is much lower than that of ex situ char (e.g., 82.24 kJ/mol) in oxy-steam atmosphere (e.g., 30% O-2 + 10% H2O). The reaction reactivity of both ex situ and in situ char increase in oxy-steam atmosphere when compared with those from O-2/CO2 combustion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据