4.7 Article

Life cycle assessment of fuel cell, electric and internal combustion engine vehicles under different fuel scenarios and driving mileages in China

期刊

ENERGY
卷 198, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117365

关键词

Life cycle assessment; Primary energy consumption; Greenhouse gas emissions; Fuel cell vehicle; Electric vehicle and internal combustion engine vehicle; Hydrogen production

资金

  1. China-UK International Cooperation and Exchange Project (Newton Advanced Fellowship)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51861130359]
  3. UK Royal Society
  4. NAF [\R1\180146]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin for Distinguished Young Scholars [18JCJQJC46700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the result of the growing problems of energy shortage and environmental pollution, the world needs more energy-saving and low-emissions vehicles. Although most future vehicles claim to have good performance, their real effects on sustainability in the life cycle under complex scenarios still need careful evaluation. In this study, a comprehensive and state-of-the-art life cycle assessment of the fuel cell vehicle, electric vehicle and internal combustion engine vehicle in China is conducted to compare their sustainability under different hydrogen production methods and driving mileages. The results show that primary energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles in the vehicle life cycle is significantly higher than that of the other two vehicles caused by the high energy consumption and emissions of battery production. In the total life cycle, fuel cell vehicles using hydrogen from electrolysis by abandoned hydropower and coke oven gas have the best performance among all scenarios when the driving mileage reaches around 75,000 km, and their advantage will become more obvious with increasing the driving mileage. In summary, it is necessary to select proper vehicle and fuel scenario based on the driving mileage to achieve good sustainability impact. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据