4.7 Article

Conversion of water hyacinth to value-added fuel via hydrothermal carbonization

期刊

ENERGY
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117193

关键词

Hydrothermal carbonization; Water hyacinth; Hydrochar; Acid and alkali catalysts; Combustion and emission characteristics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476060]
  2. Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization [2013A061401005]
  3. Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes [KLB10004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of water hyacinth (WH) was investigated to elucidate the effects of reaction temperature, residence time and pH (acid and alkali catalysts) on the chemical properties, combustion behavior and emission properties of hydrochar. Results found that high reaction temperature, long residence time and catalysts were beneficial to ameliorate the fuel properties of hydrochar in terms of calorific value and energy densification, albeit the yield and energetic recovery efficiency got deteriorated. The lower H/C, O/C and N/C ratios of hydrochar reflected more severe dehydration, decarboxylation and denitrogenation reactions within HTC process. SEM images represented that HTC could lead to the fragmentized structure of hydrochar. As HTC progressed, the vibration of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in hydrochar weakened, which was conductive to improving the hydrophobicity of hydrochar. The combustion characteristics of hydrochar got remarkable upgraded after HTC, whose combustibility index S and combustion stability index Rw were both superior to that of WH. The hydrochar obtained from the addition of alkali catalyst (NaOH) possessed lower emission concentration of SO2 and NOx during combustion, thus demonstrating better emission properties. Overall, HTC was a feasible way to bridge the gap from WH to alternative renewable fuel. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据