4.5 Article

Control Strategy for Helicopter Thermal Management System Based on Liquid Cooling and Vapor Compression Refrigeration

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en13092177

关键词

high-power; thermal management system; antifreeze liquid cooling; vapor compression refrigeration; control strategy

资金

  1. Liao Ning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1802092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the continuous application of high-power electronic equipment in aircraft, highly efficient heat transfer technology has been emphasized for airborne applications. In this paper, a thermal management system based on an antifreeze liquid cooling loop and a vapor compression refrigeration loop is presented for high-power airborne equipment in a helicopter. The simulation models of the thermal management system are built in order to study its control strategy for the changing flight conditions. The antifreeze-refrigerant evaporator and air-refrigerant condenser are specially validated with the experimental data. A dual feedforward proportion integration differentiation and expert control algorithm are adopted in the inlet temperature of the cold plate and sub-cooling control of the refrigerant by regulating the compressor speed and the fan speed, respectively. A preheating strategy for antifreeze is set up to decrease its flow resistance in cold day conditions. The control strategy for the thermal management system is finally built based on the above control methods. In this paper, two extreme conditions are discussed, including cold and hot days. Both the simulation results show that the superheated, sub-cooling and antifreeze inlet temperature of the cold plate can be controlled at 3 to8 degrees C, -10 to -3 degrees C and 18 to22 degrees C, respectively. Under the same changing flight envelope, the coefficient of performance of the vapor compression refrigeration loop is relatively stable on the cold day, which is about 6, while it has a range of 2.58-4.9 on the hot day.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据