4.5 Article

Thermodynamics-Based Process Sustainability Evaluation

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en13092132

关键词

exergy footprint; sustainability; process systems engineering; exergy accounting

资金

  1. EU by Czech Republic Operational Programme Research and Development, Education, Priority 1: Strengthening capacity for quality research, based on the SPIL project [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000456]
  2. Tomsk Polytechnic University [VIU-RSCABS-142/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article considers the problem of the evaluation of the sustainability of heterogeneous process systems, which can have different areas of focus: from single process operations to complete supply chains. The proposed method defines exergy-based concepts to evaluate the assets, liabilities, and the exergy footprint of the analysed process systems, ensuring that they are suitable for Life Cycle Assessment. The proposed concepts, evaluation framework and cumulative Exergy Composite Curves allow the quantitative assessment of process systems, including alternative solutions. The provided case studies clearly illustrate the applicability of the method and the close quantitative relationship between the exergy profit and the potential sustainability contribution of the proposed solutions. The first case study demonstrates how the method is applied to the separation and reuse of an acetic-acid-containing waste stream. It is shown that the current process is not sustainable and needs substantial external exergy input and deeper analysis. The second case study concerns Municipal Solid Waste treatment and shows the potential value and sustainability benefit that can be achieved by the extraction of useful chemicals and waste-to-energy conversion. The proposed exergy footprint accounting framework clearly demonstrates the potential to be applied to sustainability assessment and process improvement while simultaneously tracking different kinds of resources and impacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据