4.7 Article

Homologous recombination and Mus81 promote replication completion in response to replication fork blockage

期刊

EMBO REPORTS
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201949367

关键词

BIR; fork restart; Mus81; recombination; replication

资金

  1. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (Investissements d'avenir), France [ANR-10-INBS-04]
  2. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR, France)
  3. Institut National du Cancer (INCa, France)
  4. Ligue contre le Cancer (equipe labellisee, France)
  5. MSDAvenir Fund, France
  6. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BFU2013-42918P, JCI 2009-04101]
  7. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Consolider Ingenio 2010) [CSD2007-015]
  8. Junta de Andalucia (Spain) [BIO-1238, CVI-4567]
  9. European Union (FEDER)
  10. Fondation Recherche Medicale (France) [SPF20121226243]
  11. predoctoral FPU training grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  12. Labex EpiGenMed, an Investissements d'Avenir program, France [ANR-10-LABX-12-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impediments toDNAreplication threaten genome stability. The homologous recombination (HR) pathway has been involved in the restart of blocked replication forks. Here, we used a method to increase yeast cell permeability in order to study at the molecular level the fate of replication forks blocked byDNAtopoisomerase I poisoning by camptothecin (CPT). Our results indicate that Rad52 and Rad51HRfactors are required to completeDNAreplication in response toCPT. Recombination events occurring during S phase do not generally lead to the restart ofDNAsynthesis but rather protect blocked forks until they merge with convergent forks. This fusion generates structures requiring their resolution by the Mus81 endonuclease in G(2)/M. At the global genome level, the multiplicity of replication origins in eukaryotic genomes and the fork protection mechanism provided byHRappear therefore to be essential to completeDNAreplication in response to fork blockage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据