4.6 Article

Moderate oxophilic CoFe in carbon nanofiber for the oxygen evolution reaction in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 353, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136521

关键词

Oxygen evolution reaction; Anion exchange membrane water electrolysis; Non-noble metal catalyst; Graphitic carbon; In-situ XAFS

资金

  1. Korea Electric Power Corporation [CX72170124]
  2. GIST Research Institute(GRI) - GIST
  3. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [gist-08] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [GIST-08] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose corrosion-resistant carbon-coated Co0.9Fe0.1 alloy nanoparticles as highly active and durable electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEMWE). In the presence of 10% Fe atoms, the oxophilicity of Co metal is modulated in a direction to facilitate OH- adsorption on Co3+; thus, Co0.9Fe0.1-carbon nanofiber (CNF) can exhibit smaller overpotentials than other metal ratios in Co1-xFex-CNF. Additionally, we confirm catalytic degradation from the oxidation of the carbon layer, which is triggered by defects in the carbon originating from Fe during the pyrolysis step. The Co0.9Fe0.1 metal is further optimized by increasing graphitization to simultaneously achieve superior activity and durability for application on AEMWE. This work not only demonstrates the role of Fe in Co metal for controlling the proper oxophilicity but also shows the importance of graphitized carbon as a catalyst support for stable water oxidation. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据