4.6 Article

Nitrogen-doped mesoporous graphene nanoflakes for high performance ionic liquid supercapacitors

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 353, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136463

关键词

Nitrogen-doped graphene; Supercapacitors; N-doping; Tetraalkylammonium; bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic liquids

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-13-00217]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [18-13-00217] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous nitrogen-doped graphene nanoflakes (N-GNFs) with high nitrogen doping level of 5.0-10.7 at.% were produced by a facile template CVD synthesis using the mixture of acetonitrile and benzene as a precursor. The pore structure, morphology and physicochemical properties of N-GNFs were characterized by TEM, XPS, Raman spectroscopy, and low-temperature nitrogen physisorption. The electrochemical performance of N-GNFs was tested in electric double-layer capacitor (EDLC) with ionic liquid electrolyte (1.2 M N+Et4TFSI- solution in CH3CN) by cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge-discharge measurements, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. With increasing the nitrogen content in N-GNFs their specific capacitance increased and achieved 167 F g(-1) at a scan rate of 5 mV s(-1). The maximum delivered energy density was 46.3 Wh kg(-1), which corresponded to a power density of 0.74 kW kg(-1). The high electrochemical performance of N-GNFs was attributed both to the pseudo-capacitance of active nitrogen sites and to the developed mesoporosity. Different tetraalkylammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic liquids were used to evaluate the cation size effect on the sta-bility and performance of N-GNFs-based EDLCs. In contrast to N+Et4TFSI- and N+Bu4TFSI- electrolytes, the cycling performance of N-GNFs in N+Me4TFSI- was limited because of the electrode degradation resulted from the intercalation of N+Me4 ions between graphene layers and their exfoliation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据