4.6 Article

A high-performance hybrid supercapacitor with NiO derived NiO@Ni-MOF composite electrodes

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 340, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135956

关键词

Transition metal oxide (TMO); Self-sacrificed template; Metal-organic framework (MOF); Hybrid supercapacitor

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ19B030008, LQ19B060008]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Jinhua city [2019-4-162, 2019-4-164]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21775138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic framework (MOF) is a class of porous material, which has been gradually applied in supercapacitor fields but remains a significant challenge owing to their intrinsic instability and poor conductivity. Herein, we design a new strategy for synthesizing a well-aligned porous NiO@Ni-MOF/NF cylindrical cage-shape structure derived from NiO self-sacrificed template and precursor. Particularly, this unique construction structure could not only boost the conductivity of the electrode, but also endow the Ni-MOF with a good orientation to promote the transport of electrons and ion in electrochemical energy storage process. The as-prepared NiO@Ni-MOF/NF delivers an amazing specific capacity (1853 C cm(-2) at 1 mA cm(-2) ) superior to NiO/NF (242 C cm(-2)), as well as a relatively low impedance. The hybrid supercapacitor (HSC) is composed of the NiO@Ni-MOF/NF and carbon nanotube (CNT) as the positive and negative electrode, respectively. This HSC exhibits a specific capacitance of 144 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1). The maximum energy and power densities of this HSC device reach to 39.2 W h kg(-1) and 7000 W kg(-1), respectively, showing good cycling stability with 94% capacity retention over 3000 cycles. This work proposes an innovative strategy for rational preparation well-aligned MOF arrays, which could serve as a promising method in the asymmetric supercapacitor devices field. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据