4.7 Article

Identification and optimization strategy of county ecological security pattern: A case study in the Loess Plateau, China

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106030

关键词

Ecological security pattern; Ecosystem service function; Ecological sources; Minimum cumulative resistance model; The Loess Plateau

资金

  1. Charity Special Project of Ministry of Land and Resources People's Republic of China [201411007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The construction of an ecological security pattern (ESP) is an effective measure to improve the structure and function of ecosystems, maintain ecosystem services, and ensure ecological security. Our focus is the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau in China, a typical county area where the extensive use of land has put tremendous pressure on the ecosystem and caused a series of ecological problems. Therefore, considering different targets for decision makers, we introduced hot spot analysis method to construct two plans of ESP based on local conditions and the proposed long-term optimization strategy of ESP. The results showed that the ecological source areas of plans A and B accounted for 31.47% and 43.26% of the ecological land, respectively, covering the core areas of most nature reserves, effectively validating the accuracy and feasibility of our method. Additionally, the total area of the optimized ecological source was 8.91% higher than that of the existing area, which expands the radiation range of ecological sources and enhances the internal connectivity. In order to form a regional functionalized and structured spatial structure layout system, the ecological framework of two axes, four cores, six belts, and eight zones was proposed according to the spatial distribution of the river corridors and important ecological landscape components. Overall, this study adds new insight into the methodology of ESP construction that can provide important references for regional development planning and ecological protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据