4.3 Review

Role of mtDNA disturbances in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease

期刊

DNA REPAIR
卷 91-92, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102871

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Parkinson's disease; Mitochondrial DNA disturbances; Neuroinflammation; Peptide and protein aggregation; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the National Sustainability Programme II (Project BIOCEV-FAR) [LQ1604]
  2. project BIOCEV'' [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109]
  3. Charles University in Prague [SVV260521, UNCE 204064, Q26/LF1, Q27/LF1]
  4. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [17-32727A, RVO-VFN64165/2012]
  5. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [EATRIS-CZ LM2018133]
  6. Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic [FV20572]
  7. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic [TN01000013]
  8. Grant Agency of Czech Republic [GACR 18-09296S]
  9. Research, Development and Education Operational Programme [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000785]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease) are becoming increasingly problematic to healthcare systems. Therefore, their underlying mechanisms are trending topics of study in medicinal research. Numerous studies have evidenced a strong association between mitochondrial DNA disturbances (e.g. oxidative damage, mutations, and methylation shifts) and the initiation and progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, this review discusses the risk and development of neurodegenerative diseases in terms of disturbances in mitochondrial DNA and as a part of a complex ecosystem that includes other important mechanisms (e.g. neuroinflammation and the misfolding and aggregation of amyloid-beta peptides, alpha-synuclein, and tau proteins). In addition, the influence of individual mitochondrial DNA haplogroups on the risk and development of neurodegenerative diseases is also described and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据