4.4 Article

To Protect Fatty Livers from Ischemia Reperfusion Injury: Role of Ischemic Postconditioning

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 66, 期 4, 页码 1349-1359

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06328-w

关键词

Ischemia-reperfusion injury; Ischemic postconditioning; Fatty liver; Liver transplantation

资金

  1. DFG STE [1022/2-3, 1022/4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that ischemic postconditioning (IPostC) has protective effects on both healthy and fatty livers, reducing levels of lactate dehydrogenase and TXB2 while increasing bile flow. In in vivo experiments, IPostC also decreased levels of inflammatory cytokines and modulated gene expressions, thereby protecting the liver from ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Background The benefit of ischemic postconditioning (IPostC) might be the throttled inflow following cold ischemia. The current study investigated advantage and mechanisms of IPostC in healthy and fatty rat livers. Methods Male SD rats received a high-fat diet to induce fatty livers. Isolated liver perfusion was performed after 24 h ischemia at 4 degrees C as well as in vivo experiments after 90 min warm ischemia. The so-called follow-up perfusions served to investigate the hypothesis that medium from IPostC experiments is less harmful. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), transaminases, different cytokines, and gene expressions, respectively, were measured. Results Fatty livers showed histologically mild inflammation and moderate to severe fat storage. IPostC reduced LDH and TXB2 in healthy and fatty livers and increased bile flow. LDH, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 levels in serum decreased after warm ischemia + IPostC. The gene expressions of Tnf, IL-6, Ccl2, and Ripk3 were downregulated in vivo after IPostC. Conclusions IPostC showed protective effects after ischemia in situ and in vivo in healthy and fatty livers. Restricted cyclic inflow was an important mechanism and further suggested involvement of necroptosis. IPostC represents a promising and easy intervention to improve outcomes after transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据