4.4 Article

Dendroclimatic potential of dendroanatomy in temperature-sensitive Pinus sylvestris

期刊

DENDROCHRONOLOGIA
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125673

关键词

Maximum latewood density (MXD); Temperature reconstruction; Quantitative wood anatomy; Pinus sylvestris; Northern Fennoscandia; Tree-ring anatomy

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [150205]
  2. Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI [SBFI C14.0104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most frequently and successfully used tree-ring parameters for the study of temperature variations are ring width and maximum latewood density (MXD). MXD is preferred over ring width due to a more prominent association with temperature. In this study we explore the dendroclimate potential of dendroanatomy based on the first truly well replicated dataset. Twenty-nine mature living Pinus sylvestris trees were sampled in Northeastern Finland at the cool and moist boreal forest zone, close to the latitudinal tree line, where ring width, X-ray MXD as well as the blue intensity counterpart MXBI were compared with dendroanatomical parameters. Maximum radial cell wall thickness as well as anatomical MXD and latewood density appeared to be the most promising parameters for temperature reconstruction. In fact, these parameters compare favorably to MXD derived from X-ray techniques as well as MXBI, in terms of shared variation and temperature correlations across frequencies and over time. The reasons for these results are thought to be the unprecedentedly high measurement resolution of the anatomical technique, which provide the optimal resolution - the cell - whereas X-ray techniques have a slightly lower resolution and BI techniques even lower. While the results of this study are encouraging, further tests on longer and multigenerational chronologies are required to more generally and fully assess the dendroclimate potential of anatomical parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据