4.1 Review

Analysis of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs by using Microfluidic Techniques: A Review

期刊

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL ANALYSIS
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 303-315

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1573412916666200401124059

关键词

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; capillary zone electrophoresis; capillary liquid chromatography; nano-liquid chromatography; mass spectrometry; Liquid chromatography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review paper discusses the application of miniaturized techniques, including capillary electrophoresis and nano-liquid chromatography, in the separation and analysis of NSAIDs, highlighting their high mass sensitivity and potential for coupling with Mass Spectrometry.
In this review paper, miniaturized techniques, including both electromigration and liquid chromatographic techniques, have been discussed considering their main features in the analytical field for the separation and analysis of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs). In Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) and nano-liquid chromatography (nano-LC), separation is performed in capillaries with Internal Diameter (I.D.) lower than 100 mu m and therefore flow rates in the range 100-1000 nL/min are applied. Therefore, due to the low flow rate, high mass sensitivity can be obtained. Usually, conventional UV detectors are used on-line; however, these techniques can be coupled with Mass Spectrometry (MS). CE and nano-LC have also been applied to the separation of NSAIDs using silica stationary phases (SP) modified with C-18 promoting interaction with analytes mainly based on hydrophobic interaction. Besides, the use of chiral SP was found to be effective for the chiral resolution of these compounds. In addition to silica phases, monolithic (both organic and inorganic) material has also been used. Although most of the presented studies aimed to demonstrate the usefulness of the considered microfluidic techniques, some applications to real samples have also been reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据