4.2 Article

Riluzole Exhibits No Therapeutic Efficacy on a Transgenic Rat model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

期刊

CURRENT NEUROVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 275-285

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1567202617666200409125227

关键词

Autophagy; proteostasis; movement disorders; neurodegenerative diseases; transgenic rodents; Riluzole

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571256, 81760238]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [SQ2017YFSF090175]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurological disorder clinically characterized by motor system dysfunction, with intraneuronal accumulation of the TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) being a pathological hallmark. Riluzole is a primarily prescribed medicine for ALS patients, while its therapeutical efficacy appears limited. TDP-43 transgenic mice are existing animal models for mechanistic/translational research into ALS. Methods: We developed a transgenic rat model of ALS expressing a mutant human TDP-43 transgene (TDP-43(M337V)) and evaluated the therapeutic effect of Riluzole on this model. Relative to control, rats with TDP-43(M337V) expression promoted by the neurofilament heavy subunit (NEF) gene or specifically in motor neurons promoted by the choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) gene showed progressive worsening of mobility and grip strength, along with loss of motor neurons, microglial activation, and intraneuronal accumulation of TDP-43 and ubiquitin aggregations in the spinal cord. Results: Compared to vehicle control, intragastric administration of Riluzole (30 mg/kg/d) did not mitigate the behavioral deficits nor alter the neuropathologies in the transgenics. Conclusion: These findings indicate that transgenic rats recapitulate the basic neurological and neuropathological characteristics of human ALS, while Riluzole treatment can not halt the development of the behavioral and histopathological phenotypes in this new transgenic rodent model of ALS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据