4.8 Article

Climate Change Drives Poleward Increases and Equatorward Declines in Marine Species

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 1572-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.043

关键词

-

资金

  1. NERC studentships [NE/L501669/1, NE/L002434/1]
  2. NERC SeaDNA project [NE/F001878/1]
  3. NERC [NE/N005937/1, bas0100035] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Marine environments have increased in temperature by an average of 1 degrees C since pre-industrial (1850) times [1]. Given that species ranges are closely allied to physiological thermal tolerances in marine organisms [2], it may therefore be expected that ocean warming would lead to abundance increases at poleward side of ranges and abundance declines toward the equator [3]. Here, we report a global analysis of abundance trends of 304 widely distributed marine species over the last century, across a range of taxonomic groups from phytoplankton to fish and marine mammals. Specifically, using a literature database, we investigate the extent that the direction and strength of long-term species abundance changes depend on the sampled location within the latitudinal range of species. Our results show that abundance increases have been most prominent where sampling has taken place at the poleward side of species ranges, and abundance declines have been most prominent where sampling has taken place at the equatorward side of species ranges. These data provide evidence of omnipresent large-scale changes in abundance of marine species consistent with warming over the last century and suggest that adaptation has not provided a buffer against the negative effects of warmer conditions at the equatorward extent of species ranges. On the basis of these results, we suggest that projected sea temperature increases of up to 1.5 degrees C over pre-industrial levels by 2050 [4] will continue to drive latitudinal abundance shifts in marine species, including those of importance for coastal livelihoods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据