4.8 Article

Stress Disrupts Human Hippocampal-Prefrontal Function during Prospective Spatial Navigation and Hinders Flexible Behavior

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 1821-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  2. National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health [1-R21AG063131]
  3. Marcus and Amalia Wallenberg Foundation (Marcus Wallenbergs Stiftelse for Internationellt Vetenskapligt Samarbete)
  4. John Templeton Foundation
  5. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to anticipate and flexibly plan for the future is critical for achieving goal-directed outcomes. Extant data suggest that neural and cognitive stress mechanisms may disrupt memory retrieval and restrict prospective planning, with deleterious impacts on behavior. Here, we examined whether and how acute psychological stress influences goal-directed navigational planning and efficient, flexible behavior. Our methods combined fMRI, neuroendocrinology, and machine learning with a virtual navigation planning task. Human participants were trained to navigate familiar paths in virtual environments and then (concurrent with fMRI) performed a planning and navigation task that could be most efficiently solved by taking novel shortcut paths. Strikingly, relative to non-stressed control participants, participants who performed the planning task under experimentally induced acute psychological stress demonstrated (1) disrupted neural activity critical for mnemonic retrieval and mental simulation and (2) reduced traversal of shortcuts and greater reliance on familiar paths. These neural and behavioral changes under psychological stress were tied to evidence for disrupted neural replay of memory for future locations in the spatial environment, providing mechanistic insight into why and how stress can alter planning and foster inefficient behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据