4.7 Review

Targeting epigenetics in cancer: therapeutic potential of flavonoids

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
卷 61, 期 10, 页码 1616-1639

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1763910

关键词

Anticancer; cancer therapy; epigenetic; flavonoids

资金

  1. Spanish Government, Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CIBEROBN CB12/03/30038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with therapeutic challenges such as non-compliance, side effects, and economic burdens. Plant-derived flavonoids are being studied for their epigenetic regulation of cancer, with different classes of flavonoids having varying mechanisms of action.
Irrespective of sex and age, cancer is the leading cause of mortality around the globe. Therapeutic incompliance, unwanted effects, and economic burdens imparted by cancer treatments, are primary health challenges. The heritable features in gene expression that are propagated through cell division and contribute to cellular identity without a change in DNA sequence are considered epigenetic characteristics and agents that could interfere with these features and are regarded as potential therapeutic targets. The genetic modification accounts for the recurrence and uncontrolled changes in the physiology of cancer cells. This review focuses on plant-derived flavonoids as a therapeutic tool for cancer, attributed to their ability for epigenetic regulation of cancer pathogenesis. The epigenetic mechanisms of various classes of flavonoids including flavonols, flavones, isoflavones, flavanones, flavan-3-ols, and anthocyanidins, such as cyanidin, delphinidin, and pelargonidin, are discussed. The outstanding results of preclinical studies encourage researchers to design several clinical trials on various flavonoids to ascertain their clinical strength in the treatment of different cancers. The results of such studies will define the clinical fate of these agents in future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据