4.7 Review

Granular biofilms: Function, application, and new trends as model microbial communities

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2020.1769433

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; anammox; sludge granules

资金

  1. European Research Council Starting Grant [3CBIOTECH 261330]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland Career Development Award [17/CDA/4658]
  3. NUI Galway
  4. EU COST Action [1302]
  5. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [17/CDA/4658] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaerobic digestion is recognized as a sustainable method for waste management, producing methane-rich biogas. Different specialized granules, including anaerobic and aerobic granules, have opened up new opportunities in wastewater treatment and resource recovery biotechnology. Each type of granule has unique characteristics, biochemical processes, and microbial community compositions.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) for waste, and wastewater, management was identified in the 1970s as a forerunner in the push for sustainability. The development of AD applications resulted in the discovery of anaerobic granules, which are multitrophic bio-aggregates comprising methanogenic consortia capable of digesting waste organics to methane-rich biogas suitable for use as a renewable bioenergy. In the intervening years the emergence of the anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (anammox) granule, aerobic granule, hydrogenic granule, oxygenic photogranule, and many other functionally-specialized granules, has opened new opportunities in wastewater treatment, and resource-recovery, biotechnology. As a single entity, a granule represents an entire community of microorganisms. This review compares three of the most influential types: the anaerobic (methanogenic), aerobic and anammox granule. The main characteristics, biochemical processes, and typical makeup of the microbial community in each type are discussed. Finally, the adoption of granules as an intriguing playground for experiments in microbial ecology is reviewed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据