期刊
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 E523-E531出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004318
关键词
brain; inflammation; long-term study; nebulized surfactant; respiratory distress syndrome
资金
- Carlos III Health Institute [PI18/00166]
- European Regional Development Fund A way to make Europe
- Chiesi Farmaceutici
Objectives: We have setup for the first time a long-term (72 hr) respiratory distress syndrome model in spontaneously breathing surfactant-deficient newborn piglets to investigate the continuous positive airway pressure failure rate with nebulized poractant alfa compared with that with the intubation surfactant extubation technique or continuous positive airway pressure only. Design: Prospective randomized animal study. Setting: Biocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute Animal Facility. Subjects-Interventions: Eighteen newborn piglets (n = 6/group) with surfactant-deficient respiratory distress syndrome were randomized to three continuous positive airway pressure-ventilated groups: 1) nebulized surfactant (poractant alfa 400 mg/kg) via a customized investigational eFlow-Neos vibrating membrane nebulizer system, 2) bolus administration using the Intubation Surfactant Extubation method (200 mg/kg), or 3) continuous positive airway pressure alone. Measurements and Main Results: Pulmonary and hemodynamic variables were assessed at 6-hour intervals for 72 hours. Lung and brain histological analyses were performed. After bronchoalveolar lavages, piglets developed respiratory distress syndrome. Over the follow-up, both surfactant-treated groups had significantly better pulmonary outcomes than the continuous positive airway pressure alone group. Furthermore, unlike in the continuous positive airway pressure group, there were no cases of respiratory failure in either of the surfactant-treated groups. Conclusions: In newborn piglets with respiratory distress syndrome, the nebulization of 400 mg/kg of poractant alfa using a customized investigational eFlow-Neos nebulizer was found to be safe and effective in reducing the risk of respiratory failure in the 72 hours after treatment.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据