4.8 Article

Beige Adipocyte Maintenance Is Regulated by Autophagy-Induced Mitochondrial Clearance

期刊

CELL METABOLISM
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 402-419

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [DK97441, DK108822, CA126792]
  2. Diabetes and Endocrine-Related Disease Center (DERC) [DK63720]
  3. Pew Charitable Trust
  4. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  5. American Cancer Society
  6. Pancreatic Cancer Action Network-AACR
  7. American Heart Association (AHA) [15PRE23050029]
  8. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) [TG2-01153]
  9. Larry L. Hillblom Foundation (LLHF) [2014-D-025-FEL]
  10. Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation
  11. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201506350063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Beige adipocytes gained much attention as an alternative cellular target in anti-obesity therapy. While recent studies have identified a number of regulatory circuits that promote beige adipocyte differentiation, the molecular basis of beige adipocyte maintenance remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that beige adipocytes progressively lose their morphological and molecular characteristics after withdrawing external stimuli and directly acquire white-like characteristics bypassing an intermediate precursor stage. The beige-to-white adipocyte transition is tightly coupled to a decrease in mitochondria, increase in autophagy, and activation of MiT/TFE transcription factor-mediated lysosome biogenesis. The autophagy pathway is crucial for mitochondrial clearance during the transition; inhibiting autophagy by uncoupled protein 1 (UCP1(+))-adipocyte-specific deletion of Atg5 or Atg12 prevents beige adipocyte loss after withdrawing external stimuli, maintaining high thermogenic capacity and protecting against diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. The present study uncovers a fundamental mechanism by which autophagy-mediated mitochondrial clearance controls beige adipocyte maintenance, thereby providing new opportunities to counteract obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据