4.1 Review

Interarterial course of anomalous right coronary artery: role of symptoms and surgical outcomes

期刊

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 538-544

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000893

关键词

anomalous right coronary artery with interarterial course; anomalous right coronary artery; interarterial course

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anomalous origin of right coronary artery with interarterial course (ARCA-IA) is a risk factor for sudden death and other cardiac complications. Surgical correction remains its gold standard treatment. We describe clinical characteristics, workup, surgical techniques and outcomes of ARCA-IA at our center. A retrospective analysis of cardiovascular database was performed. From March 2005 through January 2011, 11 patients with mean age of 53 +/- 18 years were diagnosed with ARCA-IA. Reported symptoms included chest pain (64%), arrhythmia [27%; i.e. atrial flutter (9%), recurrent supraventricular tachycardia (9%), ventricular tachycardia (9%)], syncope (18%), dyspnea (9%) and aborted sudden cardiac death (9%). Chest pain (n = 7) was episodic and lasted longer than 6 months before diagnosis. Initial diagnosis was made at coronary computed tomography in two patients and at cardiac catheterization in nine patients. Four patients had positive stress test and were subsequently found to have ARCA-IA at cardiac catheterization. There was no operative mortality. Surgery (bypass with ligation of native vessel or translocation and reimplantation) was performed in seven patients. Three patients refused surgery, and in one patient, surgery was not considered due to comorbidities. Symptom relief was noted in all surgical patients. At mean follow-up of 36 months, two patients had noncardiac-related deaths whereas nine were asymptomatic. There were no deaths reported in patients treated surgically. Definitive surgery is indicated in symptomatic ARCA-IA and is associated with excellent long-term outcome. RCA dominance in ARCA-IA is an adverse marker with increased symptoms; this hypothesis should be tested in larger studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据