4.7 Article

Influence of nanoclays on flowability and rheology of SCC pastes

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118285

关键词

SCC paste; Nanoclays; Water adsorption; Flowability; Rheology

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness as part of the project NanoCompaC [BIA2016-77911-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SCC rheology is the key factor of fresh performance and its control is required to overcome cast in place issues regarding pumping and formwork lateral pressure that still limits its widespread use. Nanoclays are good candidates to improve rheological properties of cement pastes as yield stress, viscosity and thixotropy, controlling paste flow behavior. However, some interactions between nanoclays and admixtures can limit their efficiency. In this study, a comparative analysis on rheology and flowability of SCC cement pastes blended with limestone filler and 2% by cement weight of four types of nanoclays, attapulgite, bentonite, and sepiolite in powder form and dispersed in water, is presented. Two water to binder ratios (w/b), 0.35 and 0.45, were considered and a high range water reducing admixture (HRWRA) was used to reach the required flowability. Water adsorption of nanoclays, flowability and rheological properties of SCC cement pastes with nanoclays were evaluated. It was found that HRWRA was less effective on pastes with nanoclays and low w/b, particularly bentonite. Sepiolite showed larger water adsorption and improved rheological properties. It was observed that, the relation of nanoclays and HRWRA was decisive to produce flowability on pastes with low w/b. Besides, flowability was deeply affected by w/b, as water saturation of nanoclays increased HRWRA efficiency. All nanoclays modified rheological properties due to its different particles morphology characteristics. However, sepiolite showed the largest effects and reached the higher values of yield stress, viscosity and thixotropy ratios used. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据