4.7 Article

Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks

期刊

COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104445

关键词

Landslides susceptibility mapping; Recurrent neural networks; Long short term memory; Gated recurrent unit; Simple recurrent unit

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61271408, 41602362, 201906860029]
  2. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to use recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to perform landslide susceptibility mapping in Yongxin County, China. The two main contributions of this study are summarized as follows. First, the regular RNN is compared to its three variants in the case study of landslide susceptibility mapping for the first time, including long short term memory, gated recurrent unit and simple recurrent unit. Second, a sequential data representation method is proposed to fully explore the predicting potential of RNNs. The study area consists of 364 historical landslide locations that were divided into two parts: 255 (70%) for training and 109 (30%) for validation, and 16 landslide influencing factors were considered for spatial prediction. To validate the effectiveness of these RNN-related methods, several objective measures of accuracy, recall, F-measure, Matthews correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic were used for evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that very high and high susceptible areas are concentrated in the northwest and south of Yongxin County, while landslides in the central area are less prone to occur. Based on quantitative results, all the RNN-related methods achieved area under the curve values above 0.83 and produced accurate prediction results with the optimized parameters. Therefore, the RNN framework can be used as a useful tool for the landslide susceptibility mapping task to mitigate and manage landslides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据