4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Evaluating the performance of an operational infrasound avalanche detection system at three locations in the Swiss Alps during two winter seasons

期刊

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102962

关键词

Snow avalanches; Infrasound; Array processing; Avalanche activity; Monitoring

资金

  1. Swiss Federal Office of the Environment (FOEN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Avalanche occurrences are unambiguous indicators of unstable snow conditions. Information on past and current avalanche activity is therefore crucial for avalanche forecasting. To continuously assess avalanche activity, automatic detection systems are required. In recent years, technological and signal processing advances have led to the development of operational infrasound avalanche detection systems. We evaluated the detection performance of four operationally running infrasound detection systems installed at three different sites in the Swiss Alps during two entire winter seasons. To this end, we collected a comprehensive data set of avalanche activity using a network of automatic cameras and supplementary field observations by local observers. The events automatically identified by the systems were then compared to the data set of visually observed avalanches. Only 3% of the 839 observed avalanches were associated with automatic detections and 21% of the automatic detections were confirmed by field observations. However, the majority of observed avalanches were small and most automatic detections occurred during periods of poor visibility. Furthermore, the probability of detection (POD) increased with avalanche size, decreased with distance, and varied with avalanche type. Dry-snow avalanches were generally better detected than wet-snow and mixed-type avalanches. Large avalanches (on the order of 300 m wide and 1000 m long) within a distance of 3 km from the array were typically well detected (POD approximate to 90%). The false alarm ratio was estimated to 13-30%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据