4.7 Article

Lipid production by the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica using industrial by-products under different culture conditions

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0286-z

关键词

Yarrowia lipolytica; Oleaginous yeast; Biolipid production; Crude glycerol; Molasses; Continuous culture; Triglyceride

资金

  1. French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA)
  2. INRA
  3. French National Research Agency (Investissements d'avenir program) [ANR-11-BTBR-0003]
  4. European Union in the form of an AgreenSkills Fellowship (Marie-Curie FP7 COFUND People Program) [267196]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-11-BTBR-0003] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Microbial lipid production using renewable feedstock shows great promise for the biodiesel industry. Results: In this study, the ability of a lipid-engineered Yarrowia lipolytica strain JMY4086 to produce lipids using molasses and crude glycerol under different oxygenation conditions and at different inoculum densities was evaluated in fed-batch cultures. The greatest lipid content, 31% of CDW, was obtained using a low-density inoculum, a constant agitation rate of 800 rpm, and an oxygenation rate of 1.5 L/min. When the strain was cultured for 450 h in a chemostat containing a nitrogen-limited medium (dilution rate of 0.01 h(-1); 250 g/L crude glycerol), volumetric lipid productivity was 0.43 g/L/h and biomass yield was 60 g CDW/L. The coefficient of lipid yield to glycerol consumption (Y-L/gly) and the coefficient of lipid yield to biomass yield (Y-L/X) were equal to 0.1 and 0.4, respectively. Conclusions: These results indicate that lipids may be produced using renewable feedstock, thus providing a means of decreasing the cost of biodiesel production. Furthermore, using molasses for biomass production and recycling glycerol from the biodiesel industry should allow biolipids to be sustainably produced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据