4.6 Article

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T methods for the early detection of myocardial injury in patients on chemotherapy

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 59, 期 3, 页码 513-521

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0362

关键词

cardiac troponin; cardio-toxicity; chemotherapy; high-sensitivity methods; myocardial injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significant progress in pharmacological cancer treatment has increased survival rates, but at a cost of potential cardiotoxicity and other side effects. Studies have shown that high-sensitivity methods can detect myocardial injury early, potentially benefiting cancer patients by enabling early cardioprotective therapy. Large randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the cost/benefit ratio of using these methods for early detection of cardiotoxicity in chemotherapy patients.
Important advances achieved in pharmacological cancer treatment have led progressively to a reduction in mortality from many forms of cancer, and increasing numbers of previously incurable patients can now hope to become cancer-free. Yet, to achieve these improved outcomes a high price has been paid in terms of untoward side effects associated with treatment, cardio-toxicity in particular. Several recent studies have reported that cardiac troponin assay using high-sensitivity methods (hscTn) can enable the early detection of myocardial injury related to chemotherapy or abuse of drugs that are potentially cardiotoxic. Several authors have recently suggested that changes in hs- cTn values enable the early diagnosis of cardiac injury from chemotherapy, thus potentially benefitting cancer patients with increased troponin values by initiating early cardioprotective therapy. However, large randomised clinical trials are needed in order to evaluate the cost/benefit ratio of standardised protocols for the early detection of cardiotoxicity using the hs- cTn assay in patients treated with chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据