4.4 Review

Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory

期刊

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
卷 37, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab8fcf

关键词

energy conditions; quantum energy inequalities; singularity theorems

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skodowska-Curie grant [744037]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [744037] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the current status of the energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory. We provide a historical review and a summary of technical results and applications, complemented with a few new derivations and discussions. We pay special attention to the role of the equations of motion and to the relation between classical and quantum theories. Pointwise energy conditions were first introduced as physically reasonable restrictions on matter in the context of general relativity. They aim to express e.g. the positivity of mass or the attractiveness of gravity. Perhaps more importantly, they have been used as assumptions in mathematical relativity to prove singularity theorems and the non-existence of wormholes and similar exotic phenomena. However, the delicate balance between conceptual simplicity, general validity and strong results has faced serious challenges, because all pointwise energy conditions are systematically violated by quantum fields and also by some rather simple classical fields. In response to these challenges, weaker statements were introduced, such as quantum energy inequalities and averaged energy conditions. These have a larger range of validity and may still suffice to prove at least some of the earlier results. One of these conditions, the achronal averaged null energy condition, has recently received increased attention. It is expected to be a universal property of the dynamics of all gravitating physical matter, even in the context of semiclassical or quantum gravity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据