4.5 Article

Mechanical Properties, Crystallization and Biodegradation Behavior of the Polylactide/Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate)/Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) Blown Films

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 38, 期 10, 页码 1072-1081

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10118-020-2418-6

关键词

Polylactide; Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate); Blown films; Mechanical properties; Biodegradability

资金

  1. fund of Science and Technology Bureau of Jilin Province of China [20170204012SF]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences (Changchun Branch) [2020SYHZ0002]
  3. Science and Technology Services Network Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (STS Project) [KFJ-STS-ZDTP-082]
  4. National Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China [LQY19B040001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polylactide (PLA), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) (P(3HB-co-4HB)), and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) ternary blends were prepared by extrusion blending. The biodegradable PLA/P(3HB-co-4HB)/PBAT films were successfully obtained by using blown films technique. Excellent stiffness-toughness balance was achieved for 55/10/35 PLA/P(3HB-co-4HB)/PBAT film. The tensile strength reached 33.0 MPa (MD) and 23.5 MPa (TD), the elongation at break exceeded 130 %, and tear strength exceeded 110 kN/m. The Young's modulus as low as about 1800 MPa also met packaging applications. SEM observations revealed rough and long ligaments, indicating that the tear specimens were broken yieldingly. The addition of PBAT elastomers was the main reason for the improved toughness of the film. From DMA and SEM analysis, it was demonstrated that PLA, P(3HB-co-4HB), and PBAT were partially compatible. With increasing P(3HB-co-4HB) content, the melt and cold crystallization of PLA was promoted. The enzymatic degradation experiments indicated that the films had good biodegradability. These findings gave important implications for designing and manufacturing biodegradation package of high biological carbon content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据