4.7 Article

Ultrahigh flux of graphene oxide membrane modified with orientated growth of MOFs for rejection of dyes and oil-water separation

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 31, 期 10, 页码 2683-2688

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.04.011

关键词

GO composite membrane; Metal organic frameworks; Mg/Al-LDHs; Orientated growth; Ultra-high flux

资金

  1. key projects of science and technology of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2018GZ0421]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) has broad application prospect in separation, catalysis, and adsorption. By a facile green method, we successfully fabricated prGO@cHKUST-1 composite membrane with the modification of dopamine and orientated growth of MOFs. Mg/Al-layered double hydroxides (Mg/Al-LDHs) was used as a modulator to obtain cubic HKUST-1 (cHKUST-1) with excellent morphology and special properties. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) etc. characterization illustrated successful synthesis of cHKUST-1 and composite membranes. Cubic HKUST-1 can tune the inter-layer spacing of graphene oxide (GO) leading increase in hydrophilicity and flux of the membrane. Meanwhile, the reduction effect of PDA and intercalation effect of MOFs could change the stacked way of GO layers, forming several fuzzy pores and more active sites on membrane surface. The prGO@cHKUST-1 membrane has an excellent rejection for methylene blue (MB) (99.5%) and Congo red (CR) (71.2%). Moreover, the modified membrane exhibited 10 and 5 times higher permeation flux than that of original GO membrane and prGO membrane, respectively. Thus, using orientated growth of MOFs to synthesize GO based composite membrane will provide useful insights in ultrahigh permeation flux membranes of dye and oil-water emulsion separation. (C) 2020 Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据