4.4 Article

Salidroside accelerates fracture healing through cell-autonomous and non-autonomous effects on osteoblasts

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 367, 期 2, 页码 197-211

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-016-2535-2

关键词

Salidroside; Osteoblast; Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha); Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); Fracture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273520, 81572852, 81502256]
  2. Great Program of the Science Foundation of Tianjin [12JCZDJC26300, 15JCYBJC28900]
  3. Great Program for Science and Technology in Logistics College of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces [WHZ201202, WHB201404, WHB201405, WHB201406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salidroside (SAL), a major active component of Rhodiola rosea L., exhibits diverse pharmacological effects. However, the direct roles of SAL in fracture healing remain largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that SAL significantly promotes proliferation by altering the cell-cycle distribution of osteoblastic cells. SAL also greatly stimulates osteoblast differentiation and mineralization by inducing the expression of Runx2 and Osterix. In addition to its osteoblast-autonomous effects, SAL can activate the HIF-1 alpha pathway coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis through cell-non-autonomous effects. Our in vitro results suggest that SAL significantly up-regulates HIF-1 alpha expression at the mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, the nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity of HIF-1 alpha and the HIF-responsive gene VEGF increase following SAL treatment. Our mechanistic study revealed that the regulation of osteoblastic proliferation and HIF-1 alpha expression partly involves MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt signaling. Our in vivo analysis also demonstrated that SAL can promote angiogenesis within the callus and accelerate fracture healing. Thus, SAL promotes skeletal regeneration in cell-autonomous and cell-non-autonomous ways and might be a potential therapy for accelerating fracture healing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据