4.8 Article

Template-Assisted, Seed-Mediated Synthesis of Hierarchically Mesoporous Core-Shell UiO-66: Enhancing Adsorption Capacity and Catalytic Activity through Iterative Growth

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 4292-4302

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01065

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division [DE FG02-03-ER15457]
  2. DTRA [HDTRA1-14-1-0014]
  3. MRI program [NSF DMR-1229693]
  4. Keck Foundation
  5. International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN)
  6. State of Illinois, through the IIN
  7. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource [NSF ECCS-1542205]
  8. MRSEC program at the NU Materials Research Center [NSF DMR-1720139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hierarchically mesoporous (HM) UiO-66-F-4 shell with similar to 8 nm mesopores can be iteratively grown on top of UiO-66 nanoparticle (NP) seeds over several cycles templated by Pluronic F-127 micelles. Presumably, the Pluronic micelles that were formed in water can surround UiO-66 NPs to facilitate the overgrowth of an HM-UiO-66-F-4 shell in the presence of Zr-IV precursors and BDC-F-4 linkers. The UiO-66 NP seeds play an important role in directing the continuous growth of the HM-UiO-66-F-4 shell, as only a nonporous phase was obtained in their absence. This template-assisted, seed-mediated method can be extended to produce other UiO-66-X (X = (OH)(2), (COOH)(2), etc.) shells, demonstrating its generality for the UiO-66 family of metal-organic frameworks. Notably, the incorporation of mesopores into the thrice-overgrown UiO-66@HM vertical bar(3rd)-UiO-66-F-4 materials leads to impressive enhancements in the per-mass uptake capacity of Direct Blue 86, a large anionic dye: 320% better than the parent UiO-66 seeds and 150% better than that for a [UiO-66 + UiO-66-F-4] physical mixture at the same mass proportion. Similar enhancements were also observed in the catalyzed oxidation of thioanisole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据