4.8 Article

Tin-Lead Alloying for Efficient and Stable All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 2782-2794

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04265

关键词

-

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Nature Science Foundation of China [LY18F040008]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo Municipal Government of China [2016A610108]
  3. Foundation of Department of Education of Zhejiang Province [Y201533502]
  4. DOE BES [DE-SC0013957]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11401328]
  6. National Science Foundation [ECC-1542101]
  7. University of Washington
  8. Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute
  9. National Institutes of Health
  10. Clean Energy Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cesium-containing all-inorganic perovskites have received considerable interest in photovoltaics research because of their potential for improved stability compared to their organic- inorganic hybrid counterparts. However, the inorganic perovskites studied thus far still suffer from lower power conversion efficiency and long-term instability due to an unfavorable bandgap and either phase instability or air sensitivity. Herein, a strategy to mitigate these concerns is investigated by alloying tin and lead on the B site to form tin-lead-alloyed low-bandgap (similar to 1.34 eV) inorganic CsSn0.3Pb0.7I3 perovskites. Solar cells made using this material in a full device architecture with PEDOT/PSS hole transport materials (HTM) attain power conversion efficiency (PCE) up to 9.4% (stabilized PCE 7.2%). Furthermore, a simple HTM-free device without the PEDOT/PSS layer is demonstrated to be more stable than the full-structured device and exhibits a PCE of 7.6% (stabilized PCE 7.3%), the highest efficiency to date for an inorganic perovskite with a bandgap below 1.4 eV. This simplified device structure shows good reproducibility and stability. This work provides a possible route for fabricating low-cost, high-stability devices with competitive efficiencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据