4.8 Article

Repression of the Antioxidant NRF2 Pathway in Premature Aging

期刊

CELL
卷 165, 期 6, 页码 1361-1374

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB964800, 2014CB910503]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA01020312]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA020307]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81330008, 31222039, 31201111, 81371342, 81300261, 81300677, 81271266, 81471414, 81422017, 81401159]
  5. Program of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z151100003915072]
  6. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7141005, 5142016]
  7. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJZDEW-TZ-L05]
  8. Thousand Young Talents program of China
  9. Intramural Research Program of the NIH/NCI/CCR
  10. Progeria Research Foundation grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a rare, invariably fatal premature aging disorder. The disease is caused by constitutive production of progerin, a mutant form of the nuclear architectural protein lamin A, leading, through unknown mechanisms, to diverse morphological, epigenetic, and genomic damage and to mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) attrition in vivo. Using a high-throughput siRNA screen, we identify the NRF2 antioxidant pathway as a driver mechanism in HGPS. Progerin sequesters NRF2 and thereby causes its subnuclear mislocalization, resulting in impaired NRF2 transcriptional activity and consequently increased chronic oxidative stress. Suppressed NRF2 activity or increased oxidative stress is sufficient to recapitulate HGPS aging defects, whereas reactivation of NRF2 activity in HGPS patient cells reverses progerin-associated nuclear aging defects and restores in vivo viability of MSCs in an animal model. These findings identify repression of the NRF2-mediated antioxidative response as a key contributor to the premature aging phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据