4.8 Review

Metabolic Control of Longevity

期刊

CELL
卷 166, 期 4, 页码 802-821

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.031

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and Botin Foundation (Spain)
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad and Gobierno del Principado de Asturias (Spain)
  3. Fundacion Bancaria Caja de Ahorros de Asturias
  4. FWF grants LIPOTOX [I1000, P 27893, P24381-B20]
  5. BMWFW grant Unconventional research''
  6. Ligue contre le Cancer (equipe labelisee)
  7. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR) - Projets blancs
  8. ANR
  9. ERA-Net for Research on Rare Diseases
  10. Association pour la recherche sur le cancer (ARC)
  11. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  12. Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  13. Institut Universitaire de France
  14. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  15. European Commission (ArtForce)
  16. European Research Council (ERC)
  17. LeDucq Foundation
  18. LabEx Immuno-Oncology
  19. SIRIC Stratified Oncology Cell DNA Repair and Tumor Immune Elimination (SOCRATE)
  20. SIRIC Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine (CARPEM)
  21. Paris Alliance of Cancer Research Institutes (PACRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several metabolic alterations accumulate over time along with a reduction in biological fitness, suggesting the existence of a metabolic clock'' that controls aging. Multiple inborn defects in metabolic circuitries accelerate aging, whereas genetic loci linked to exceptional longevity influence metabolism. Each of the nine hallmarks of aging is connected to undesirable metabolic alterations. The main features of the westernized'' lifestyle, including hypercaloric nutrition and sedentariness, can accelerate aging as they have detrimental metabolic consequences. Conversely, lifespan-extending maneuvers including caloric restriction impose beneficial pleiotropic effects on metabolism. The introduction of strategies that promote metabolic fitness may extend healthspan in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据