4.7 Article

Free and bound chloride relationships affecting reinforcement cover in alkali activated concrete

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103692

关键词

Alkali activated cementitious materials (AACM) concrete; Chloride binding isotherms; Free chloride concentration; Total bound chloride concentration; Chloride diffusion coefficient (D-c)(f); Surface chloride concentration (C-0)(f)

资金

  1. Innovate UK
  2. EPSRC
  3. Government of India [EP/P026206/1]
  4. Tertiary Education Trust Fund, Ministry of Education, Federal Republic of Nigeria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the free chloride profiles, diffusion parameters and chloride binding capacity of an alkali activated concrete (AACM) together with a control Portland cement (PC) concrete. Ggbs based AACM concrete specimens with different molarity of activator were exposed to a 5% NaCl solution for 540days to determine their free chloride diffusion properties. The relationships between the free and bound chloride concentration were determined by applying Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms. The required cover to steel reinforcement for corrosion prevention is derived to satisfy the limiting thresholds of free and bound chloride concentrations. The results show that Fick's second law of diffusion applies to the free chloride profiles of AACM concrete and provides higher values of diffusion coefficients than a similar grade of PC concrete. The relationship between the free and bound chlorides is defined by the Langmuir isotherm. PC concrete has higher chloride binding capacity than AACM concrete for both water and acid soluble chlorides. Less concrete cover to steel reinforcement is required in AACM than PC concrete when calculated by using the bound chloride concentration threshold limit. The values of cover based on the corresponding free chloride limit in AACM concrete are higher than its bound chloride values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据