4.7 Review

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: pathogenesis, pro-arrhythmic remodelling, and novel approaches for risk stratification and therapy

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 116, 期 9, 页码 1571-1584

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa084

关键词

Cardiomyopathy; Arrhythmia

资金

  1. Netherlands Cardio Vascular Research Initiative (CVON): the Dutch Heart Foundation
  2. Dutch Federation of University Medical Centres
  3. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
  4. Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences [CVON-eDETECT 2015-12, CVON-PREDICT2 2018-30]
  5. Registry for Cardio-Cerebro-Vascular Pathology, Veneto Region, Venice, Italy, Ministry of Health [RF 2013_I 02356762, RF-2016-02363774]
  6. PRIN Ministry of Education, University and Research, Rome, Italy [2015ZLNETW_001, 20173ZWACS]
  7. CARIPAROFoundation, Padua, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a life-threatening cardiac disease caused by mutations in genes predominantly encoding for desmosomal proteins that lead to alterations in the molecular composition of the intercalated disc. ACM is characterized by progressive replacement of cardiomyocytes by fibrofatty tissue, ventricular dilatation, cardiac dysfunction, and heart failure but mostly dominated by the occurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). As SCD appears mostly in apparently healthy young individuals, there is a demand for better risk stratification of suspected ACM mutation carriers. Moreover, disease severity, progression, and outcome are highly variable in patients with ACM. In this review, we discuss the aetiology of ACM with a focus on proarrhythmic disease mechanisms in the early concealed phase of the disease. We summarize potential new biomarkers which might be useful for risk stratification and prediction of disease course. Finally, we explore novel therapeutic strategies to prevent arrhythmias and SCD in the early stages of ACM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据