4.5 Article

Acquired resistance to trastuzumab/pertuzumab or to T-DM1 in vivo can be overcome by HER2 kinase inhibition with TAS0728

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 111, 期 6, 页码 2123-2131

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.14407

关键词

HER2 kinase inhibition; pertuzumab; TAS0728; T-DM1; trastuzumab

类别

资金

  1. Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HER2-targeting antibodies (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) and a HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate (trastuzumab emtansine: T-DM1) are used for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. However, these treatments eventually become ineffective due to acquired resistance and there is an urgent need for alternative therapies. TAS0728 is a small-molecule, irreversible selective HER2 kinase inhibitor. In the present study, we established new in vivo models of cancer resistance by continuous exposure to a combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab or to T-DM1 for evaluating the effect of TAS0728 on HER2 antibody-resistant populations. Treatment with trastuzumab and pertuzumab or with T-DM1 initially induced tumor regression in NCI-N87 xenografts. However, tumor regrowth during treatment indicated loss of drug effectiveness. In tumors with acquired resistance to trastuzumab and pertuzumab or to T-DM1, HER2-HER3 phosphorylation was retained. Switching to TAS0728 resulted in a significant anti-tumor effect associated with HER2-HER3 signal inhibition. No alternative receptor tyrosine kinase activation was observed in these resistant tumors. Furthermore, in a patient-derived xenograft model derived from breast cancer refractory to both trastuzumab/pertuzumab and T-DM1, TAS0728 exerted a potent anti-tumor effect. These results suggest that tumors with acquired resistance to trastuzumab and pertuzumab and to T-DM1 are still dependent on oncogenic HER2-HER3 signaling and are vulnerable to HER2 signal inhibition by TAS0728. These results provide a rationale for TAS0728 therapy for breast cancers that are refractory to established anti-HER2 therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据