4.8 Article

ERK-Mediated Loss of miR-199a-3p and Induction of EGR1 Act as a Toggle Switch of GBM Cell Dedifferentiation into NANOG- and OCT4-Positive Cells

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 80, 期 16, 页码 3236-3250

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0855

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Association Sauvons Laura
  2. Association Dimitri Bessieres
  3. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR Jeunes Chercheurs, Jeunes Chercheuses, GLIOMIRSTEM project)
  4. Fondation de France
  5. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  6. INCA PLBIO
  7. ITMO CANCER plan cancer
  8. Association pour le developpement de la Recherche sur les tumeurs urologiques, cerebrales et pulmonaires (ADeRTU)
  9. INSERM
  10. CNRS
  11. UNSA
  12. UCA
  13. Conseil departemental 06
  14. Canceropole PACA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is great interest in understanding how the cancer stem cell population may be maintained in solid tumors. Here, we show that tumor cells exhibiting stem-like properties and expression of pluripotency markers NANOG and OCT4 can arise from original differentiated tumor cells freshly isolated from human glioblastomas (GBM) and that have never known any serum culture conditions. Induction of EGR1 by EGFR/ERK signaling promoted cell conversion from a less aggressive, more differentiated cellular state to a self-renewing and strongly tumorigenic state, expressing NANOG and OCT4. Expression of these pluripotency markers occurred before the cells re-entered the cell cycle, demonstrating their capacity to change and dedifferentiate without any cell divisions. In differentiated GBM cells, ERK-mediated repression of miR-199a-3p induced EGR1 protein expression and triggered dedifferentiation. Overall, this signaling pathway constitutes an ERK-mediated toggle switch that promotes pluripotency marker expression and stem-like features in GBM cells. Significance: This study defines an ERK-mediated molecular mechanism of dedifferentiation of GBM cells into a stem-like state, expressing markers of pluripotency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据