4.7 Article

Prognostic role of PD-L1 and immune-related gene expression profiles in giant cell tumors of bone

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 1905-1916

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02594-9

关键词

Giant cell tumor of bone; PD-L1; Immune-related genes; NanoString technology; Prognosis

资金

  1. Fondazione per i Tumori muscolo scheletrici, Torino [1704/2018]
  2. Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca-MIUR) under the program Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022 [D15D18000410001]
  3. Fondazione Umberto Veronesi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive and rarely metastatic tumor, with a relatively unpredictable clinical course. A retrospective series of 46 GCTB and a control group of 24 aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) were selected with the aim of investigating the PD-L1 expression levels and immune-related gene expression profile, in correlation with clinicopathological features. PD-L1 and Ki67 were immunohistochemically tested in each case. Furthermore, comprehensive molecular analyses were carried out using NanoString technology and nCounter PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel, and the gene expression results were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics. PD-L1 expression was observed in 13/46 (28.3%) GCTB (and in 1/24, 4.2%, control ABC, only) and associated with a shorter disease free interval according to univariate analysis. Moreover, in PD-L1-positive lesions, three genes (CD27, CD6 and IL10) were significantly upregulated (p < 0.01), while two were downregulated (LCK and TLR8, showing borderline significance, p = 0.06). Interestingly, these genes can be related to maturation and immune tolerance of bone tissue microenvironment, suggesting a more immature/anergic phenotype of giant cell tumors. Our findings suggest that PD-L1 immunoreactivity may help to select GCTB patients with a higher risk of recurrence who could potentially benefit from immune checkpoint blockade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据