4.8 Article

Integrated Molecular and Clinical Analysis of 1,000 Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas

期刊

CANCER CELL
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 569-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Government of Canada through Genome Canada [OGI-121]
  2. Ontario Genomics Institute [OGI-121]
  3. Kid's Brain Tumor Cure
  4. Brain Tumor Research Assistance and Information Network
  5. Pediatric Low-Grade Astrocytoma Foundation
  6. Meagan's Walk
  7. B.r.a.i.n.child Canada
  8. Canadian Cancer Society [702296]
  9. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [159805]
  10. Garron Family Chair in Childhood Cancer Research at The Hospital for Sick Children
  11. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CGS-M) scholarship
  12. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  13. Tokyo Children's Cancer Study Group (TCCSG) scholarship of the Gold Ribbons Network of Japan
  14. Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology
  15. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Core grant [P30-CA008748]
  16. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC) of St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) are frequently driven by genetic alterations in the RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase (RAS/MAPK) pathway yet show unexplained variability in their clinical outcome. To address this, we characterized a cohort of >1,000 clinically annotated pLGG. Eighty-four percent of cases harbored a driver alteration, while those without an identified alteration also often exhibited upregulation of the RAS/MAPK pathway. pLGG could be broadly classified based on their alteration type. Rearrangement-driven tumors were diagnosed at a younger age, enriched for WHO grade I histology, infrequently progressed, and rarely resulted in death as compared with SNV-driven tumors. Further sub-classification of clinical-molecular correlates stratified pLGG into risk categories. These data highlight the biological and clinical differences between pLGG subtypes and opens avenues for future treatment refinement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据