4.1 Article

CAEP 2019 Academic Symposium: Got competence? Best practices in trainee progress decisions

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 187-193

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1017/cem.2019.480

关键词

Education; emergency medicine; residents and fellows

资金

  1. Academic Section of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Competence committees play a key role in a competency-based system of assessment. These committees are tasked with reviewing and synthesizing clinical performance data to make judgments regarding residents' competence. Canadian emergency medicine (EM) postgraduate training programs recently implemented competence committees; however, a paucity of literature guides their work. Objective The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based recommendations to optimize the function and decisions of competence committees in Canadian EM training programs. Methods Semi-structured interviews of EM competence committee chairs were conducted and analyzed. The interview guide was informed by a literature review of competence committee structure, processes, and best practices. Inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts was conducted to identify emerging themes. Preliminary recommendations, based on themes, were drafted and presented at the 2019 CAEP Academic Symposium on Education. Through a live presentation and survey poll, symposium attendees representing the national EM community participated in a facilitated discussion of the recommendations. The authors incorporated this feedback and identified consensus among symposium attendees on a final set of nine high-yield recommendations. Conclusion The Canadian EM community used a structured process to develop nine best practice recommendations for competence committees addressing: committee membership, meeting processes, decision outcomes, use of high-quality performance data, and ongoing quality improvement. These recommendations can inform the structure and processes of competence committees in Canadian EM training programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据