4.0 Review

Timing of Cache Creek Ocean closure: insights from new Jurassic radiolarian ages in British Columbia and Yukon and their significance for Canadian Cordillera tectonics

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
卷 57, 期 10, 页码 1167-1179

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjes-2019-0236

关键词

Cache Creek Terrane; Radiolaria; Jurassic; Canadian Cordillera; radiolarian chert; Bridge River Terrane

资金

  1. Geological Survey of Canada (Vancouver)
  2. British Columbia Geological Survey Branch (Victoria)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The closure of the Cache Creek Ocean during the Jurassic led to the structuration of the Canadian Cordillera. To reassess the timing of this major tectonic event, this study proposes a biochronological review of all the youngest radiolarian-bearing localities of the Cache Creek Terrane in British Columbia and Yukon using updated radiolarian biozonations and taxonomy, complemented by new data from the type locality. The results show that all ages are Early Jurassic and fairly homogenous along the entire terrane. All the youngest siliceous rocks are restricted to the late Sinemurian - early Toarcian interval (similar to 195-180 Ma). The youngest well-dated pelagic cherts are early Pliensbachian, with slightly younger siliceous argillites of Pliensbachian and possibly early Toarcian age. These results suggest that Cache Creek deep pelagic sedimentation ceased fairly synchronously along the entire belt, probably during the Pliensbachian (similar to 191-183 Ma), predating the final closure of the basin when Cache Creek units were thrust over Stikinia and Quesnellia in the Middle and Late Jurassic. This apparent synchronicity should result in re-evaluating the tectonic mechanism of the Cache Creek entrapment model in its present form. The study also shows that pelagic sedimentation ceased 22-31 million years earlier in the Cache Creek Terrane than in the Bridge River Terrane, confirming the stratigraphic discrepancy between the two terranes during the Jurassic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据