4.3 Article

An alternative high-throughput staining method for detection of neutral lipids in green microalgae for biodiesel applications

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 1044-1055

出版社

KOREAN SOC BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1007/s12257-015-0281-z

关键词

biodiesel; FeSO4; flow cytometry; neutral lipid; nile red; organic solvents

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi (India) [DST/IS-STAC/CO2-SR-166/13(G)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and high-throughput method for determining in situ intracellular neutral lipid accumulation in Chlorella ellipsoidea and Chlorococcum infusionum with flow cytometry and confocal microscopy was established by employing different solvents and a lipophilic dye, Nile red. Seven different organic solvents, acetic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), acetone, methanol, ethanol, n-hexane, and chloroform at different concentrations ranging from 0 to 80% (v/v) were tested. The fluorescence signal for neutral lipids was collected with a 586/42 emission filter (PE-A) and the maximum fluorescence intensity (% grandparent) was measured as 74.01 +/- 4.82% for Chlorella and 70.1 +/- 5.52% for Chlorococcum at 30% acetic acid (v/v). The statistical analysis of Nile red-stained cells showed a high coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), mean, and median values in the acetic acid-based staining method, followed by DMSO, n-hexane and chloroform. Confocal microscopy revealed a high rate of accumulation of cytosolic neutral lipids when stained with Nile red and other organic solvents. Higher lipid accumulation in Fesupplemented conditions was also detected and a maximum lipid content of 57.36 +/- 0.41% (4-fold) in Chlorella and 48.20 +/- 0.43% (4-fold) in Chlorococcum were measured at 0.001 g/L of ferrous sulfate (FeSO4). High fluorescence intensity (75.16 +/- 0.24% in Chlorella and 72.24 +/- 1.07% in Chlorococcum) in Fe-treated cells confirmed the efficiency of the staining procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据