4.6 Article

A rockburst intensity criterion based on the Geological Strength Index, experiences learned from a deep tunnel

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-020-01774-2

关键词

Rockburst intensity evaluation; Construction stage; Rock mass strength; Stress-strength ratio of rock mass; GSI

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51839003, 51621006]
  2. Science and Technology Development Project of China Railway [2017G006-B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The occurrence of rockburst is related to the surrounding rock stress and geological rock mass strength. Rockburst occurs frequently during the construction at a deep tunnel in southwest China (a tunnel with a depth of approximately 2080 m, and a length of 13 km), leading to casualties, damage to construction equipment, and schedule delays. The application of the rockburst criteria based on the stress-strength/strength-stress ratio shows that they are not suitable for the construction stage. This paper suggests a simple and feasible rockburst intensity criterion based on the Geological Strength Index (GSI) for the construction stage. In this criterion, the strength of the rock mass exposed during excavation is estimated by the Hoek-Brown criterion and is used to reflect the geological conditions of the surrounding rock, considering the influences of the joint conditions and engineering disturbance. The maximum principal stress along the tunnel is obtained by the in situ stress inversion. The ratio of the rock mass strength to the maximum principal stress (sigma(cm)/sigma(1)) is taken as the evaluation index. The criterion is as follows: sigma(cm)/sigma(1) > 1.2, none rockburst; 0.75 < sigma(cm)/sigma(1) <= 1.2, slight rockburst; 0.4 < sigma(cm)/sigma(1) <= 0.75, moderate rockburst; and sigma(cm)/sigma(1) <= 0.4, intense rockburst. The engineering applications show the reliability of this rockburst intensity criterion. The results of this paper provide a reference for rockburst intensity evaluation during the construction stage of deep tunnels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据